{"id":"W2121239333","doi":"10.2308/aud.2006.25.1.27","title":"An Analysis of Cross-Sectional Differences in Big and Non-Big Public Accounting Firms' Audit Programs","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Accounting; Business; Quality audit; Big Four; Big data; Empirical evidence; Earnings; Sample (material); Audit evidence; Joint audit; Audit risk; Control (management); Empirical research; Economics; Internal audit; Statistics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003347134,0.0001414866,0.0002068731,0.001368621,0.000215249,0.0006739811,0.0003727759,0.0003579284,0.002361546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01268859,0.0002186714,0.0003186827,0.001506084,0.0002713183,0.0005586764,0.0007338612,0.0003761026,0.0003755139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003745045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002205426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003516526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004796965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998211,0.0006373655,0.0001932638,0.0003236101,0.0003611698,0.0002736677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9647903,0.01603866,0.01270162,0.002244986,0.002068592,0.002155836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006017612,0.00003552556,0.9979424,0.000003557103,0.00006146062,0.00001407702,0.000155025,0.00007372223,0.0001050483,0.00002617026,0.00004570385,0.001477272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.565692e-7,0.00002147963,0.9997014,8.220252e-7,0.00000701515,0.00001125837,0.00008691736,0.00008727195,0.00002953939,0.000006243332,0.00004657279,7.985141e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.999358,0.00004425329,0.0001078336,0.000009404473,0.000001455736,0.000005527613,0.0001991942,0.000002107298,0.0002723828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991856,0.00002208784,0.00005618993,0.000005837194,0.000003029307,0.000006985247,0.0004829539,0.000001620148,0.0002357246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003516526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01770151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01813706300484675,"score_gpt":0.2637147382672433,"score_spread":0.2455776752623965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}