{"id":"W2121239333","doi":"10.2308/aud.2006.25.1.27","title":"An Analysis of Cross-Sectional Differences in Big and Non-Big Public Accounting Firms' Audit Programs","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Accounting; Business; Quality audit; Big Four; Big data; Empirical evidence; Earnings; Sample (material); Audit evidence; Joint audit; Audit risk; Control (management); Empirical research; Economics; Internal audit; Statistics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006878645,0.0002911887,0.0006170382,0.001351449,0.0003163549,0.001332234,0.0005598004,0.0001137852,0.0001189688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01909488,0.0002708063,0.0002196818,0.001964255,0.0002654995,0.004981509,0.0002250566,0.0006436533,0.00001010769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001016052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008925171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001052987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004448001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996716,0.0001617782,0.001292399,0.0004170871,0.000918427,0.0004943292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.965359,0.001051974,0.03231356,0.000261739,0.0009823054,0.000031437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001333377,0.000373212,0.9253366,0.0001024854,0.0004387641,0.00005850889,0.0001492852,0.0009563977,0.0003785344,0.007173074,0.0000362592,0.06486357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008025748,0.00006049546,0.9845418,0.0001581669,0.000725228,0.00002481164,0.001200598,0.002809436,0.00001441661,0.003828699,0.005539729,0.0002940601],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.96048,0.0001891099,0.03443771,0.0004341885,0.0003849378,0.0001499336,0.000003030696,0.00003813062,0.003882987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964007,0.00003366962,0.0007462227,0.0003772569,0.00225739,0.000008591757,0.0000160472,0.00003738805,0.0001227574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06456951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01813706300484675,"score_gpt":0.2637147382672433,"score_spread":0.2455776752623965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}