{"id":"W2121251908","doi":"10.2308/aud.2002.21.1.79","title":"An Experimental Investigation of the Efficacy of Lawyers' Letters","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Privilege (computing); Accrual; Damages; Accounting; Business; Psychology; Litigation risk analysis; Law; Actuarial science; Political science; Earnings","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009334391,0.0004612786,0.0006244117,0.0003317834,0.0005789649,0.001575193,0.0009615921,0.001697473,0.004739555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.104733,0.0005695517,0.000280133,0.0002520985,0.001416387,0.001201215,0.0009201365,0.001747231,0.0006032926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003943007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005737763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002288564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001984204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.987069,0.008165692,0.00112362,0.001187089,0.001999858,0.0004546613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.770534,0.1873339,0.02621247,0.01143091,0.002274074,0.002214544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.09526782,0.2463451,0.1084075,0.002177718,0.0007196679,0.001414815,0.02789173,0.007217695,0.2963943,0.01649708,0.002621793,0.1950447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02867292,0.4504705,0.2757485,0.0006106283,0.0008792275,0.00186178,0.00975563,0.04030914,0.1459065,0.02663164,0.01862046,0.0005331528],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973913,0.00003174744,0.000767165,0.0001584376,0.00003118031,0.0001680936,0.00001827499,0.00001302245,0.001420704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995083,0.00005250253,0.003043815,0.0002465431,0.00004623639,0.0004024977,0.00002472975,0.000006131413,0.001094532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009334391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04936552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03062379700878535,"score_gpt":0.2424033332378096,"score_spread":0.2117795362290243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}