{"id":"W2121284069","doi":"10.1139/t03-002","title":"A simplified method for 3D slope stability analysis","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Limit analysis; Slope stability analysis; Stability (learning theory); Limit (mathematics); Slope stability; Upper and lower bounds; Mathematics; Moment (physics); Range (aeronautics); Rotation (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Geotechnical engineering; Geology; Engineering; Physics; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004841956,0.000751779,0.0008154973,0.001504615,0.0006941818,0.0009955638,0.001517721,0.0006717488,0.01235651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001535367,0.000515515,0.001077307,0.0006233479,0.0005110808,0.0009960092,0.001372145,0.001040017,0.004803334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006673437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001062052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004294914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003953216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994475,0.00009036998,0.00002254024,0.0000598053,0.0003593105,0.00002042922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994815,0.000129295,0.00003175011,0.0001403168,0.0001955753,0.00002173175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006718124,0.00007569673,0.000630124,0.0003286801,0.0000706216,0.0002555662,0.0002803114,0.4033223,0.05676841,0.1628107,0.01011112,0.3652793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001485836,0.00001886864,0.000220039,0.00002686768,0.00001482231,0.0001700803,0.00001877895,0.9445105,0.004790921,0.01824539,0.03193623,0.00003273724],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006892881,0.00004379648,0.9969931,0.00001613295,0.00001955045,0.00002047581,0.00004286835,0.000344027,0.001830776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05142229,0.0003382452,0.9397715,0.00006098272,0.00004657434,0.0003626899,0.0003261734,0.0004796772,0.007191945],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01235651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04133666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01402143414627889,"score_gpt":0.2359657225340009,"score_spread":0.221944288387722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}