{"id":"W2121299197","doi":"10.1139/f04-004","title":"Capturerecapture estimates of space used in streams (CRESUS) at the population scale: case study on<i>Zingel asper</i>(percid), a threatened species of the Rhône catchment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Population; Threatened species; Riffle; STREAMS; Abiotic component; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Scale (ratio); Population size; Statistics; Geography; Fishery; Habitat; Biology; Cartography; Mathematics; Demography; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001304808,0.0002110834,0.0002128762,0.00110157,0.0002344524,0.0003417781,0.0003440788,0.0001981698,0.0003267169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003080763,0.0001143243,0.0002225453,0.0006709376,0.0003297086,0.0003478958,0.0004594336,0.0001518011,0.00005716562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002743095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001602018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01001354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02835413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994006,0.000289875,0.00004987839,0.000121864,0.00009731632,0.00004035517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978529,0.001022086,0.0007007723,0.0001786583,0.0001822648,0.00006334746],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000474617,0.00001871263,0.9800402,0.00002068055,0.00006224518,0.0001510781,0.0006343166,0.002380098,0.001707603,0.0001900624,0.00003571912,0.01471191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004253717,0.0001503083,0.9840989,0.000007359078,0.00003524359,0.0003920685,0.0007212059,0.01281872,0.001273397,0.0001605272,0.0003212341,0.00001688858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980667,0.00004649454,0.001679216,0.000007751345,4.424287e-7,0.000008027996,0.00004814207,0.000004701707,0.0001384802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975361,0.00002583807,0.002226978,0.00000188108,0.000001177165,0.000007937966,0.00008795377,0.000001799181,0.0001103359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01001354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01991051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02007862372260678,"score_gpt":0.2239342407546542,"score_spread":0.2038556170320475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}