{"id":"W2121339862","doi":"10.1186/2192-1709-3-8","title":"Novel ecosystems in ecological restoration and rehabilitation: Innovative planning or lowering the bar?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Processes","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Restoration ecology; Novel ecosystem; Ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Interim; Environmental restoration; Stewardship (theology); Environmental stewardship; Ecosystem; Biodiversity; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental ethics; Geography; Political science; Environmental science; Politics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007802665,0.0001146003,0.0001730598,0.00002413913,0.000203328,0.00006576229,0.0001747531,0.0001018507,0.0005452104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001181118,0.00005650278,0.00001086813,0.0004732672,0.00005629615,0.0002944023,0.0001448688,0.0001267962,0.0000715426],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007295837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001474934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005723554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004122156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989964,0.00007680899,0.0002814458,0.0003008719,0.0001375266,0.0002069862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985388,0.001189377,0.00010374,0.0001029097,0.00002391758,0.00004128573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001245027,0.0002397185,0.9888268,0.0002686559,0.000007270214,0.000009410846,0.00184982,0.00644778,0.0004883059,0.0003237403,0.0006579453,0.0007561019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000481478,0.00070223,0.9816071,0.00007228649,0.000004149601,0.00001590339,0.0007639559,0.006644737,0.00008951663,0.001173029,0.008254244,0.0001914121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994239,0.000026355,0.0002483362,0.000965629,0.00008376597,0.0002801322,0.000001508492,0.00004163337,0.004113582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990748,0.000006760196,0.0003735173,0.0003433157,0.00006384464,0.0001022131,0.000003252252,0.000004779463,0.0000275668],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007596299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5969672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0220413778755238,"score_gpt":0.2559619847826696,"score_spread":0.2339206069071458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}