{"id":"W2121339862","doi":"10.1186/2192-1709-3-8","title":"Novel ecosystems in ecological restoration and rehabilitation: Innovative planning or lowering the bar?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Processes","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Restoration ecology; Novel ecosystem; Ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Interim; Environmental restoration; Stewardship (theology); Environmental stewardship; Ecosystem; Biodiversity; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental ethics; Geography; Political science; Environmental science; Politics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008616456,0.001163775,0.001531852,0.001311614,0.003261022,0.01436871,0.00192088,0.005509679,0.004627574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0226921,0.0004577167,0.001370175,0.0007681648,0.004767734,0.007543246,0.002907017,0.01096269,0.001470851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001761431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00414608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005614937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002049277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995864,0.001305017,0.0005454823,0.0004808604,0.001384893,0.0004196544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802555,0.01068147,0.001240146,0.0005035685,0.004881579,0.002437797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007993447,0.00004537755,0.0003912776,0.001359812,0.0000475515,0.0003947325,0.001228995,0.0002335109,0.0005939272,0.01573311,0.9214312,0.05846047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001067691,0.00009792348,0.0005259934,0.00071836,0.00004334666,0.0006272272,0.001807745,0.0002860771,0.0004345728,0.01291962,0.9824865,0.00004188221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008415048,0.02329063,0.002240582,0.1323217,0.8380304,0.00002984848,0.00002910347,0.00007722402,0.003139067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01378171,0.04151533,0.003170072,0.05149404,0.8765666,0.00005065481,0.00004215236,0.0001485628,0.01323096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01436871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04556876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0220413778755238,"score_gpt":0.2559619847826696,"score_spread":0.2339206069071458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}