{"id":"W2121347402","doi":"10.1016/j.mcm.2011.03.026","title":"An LP-based inconsistency monitoring of pairwise comparison matrices","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical and Computer Modelling","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hungarian Scientific Research Fund","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Consistency (knowledge bases); Decision maker; Matrix (chemical analysis); Process (computing); Linear programming; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Statistics; Discrete mathematics; Operations research","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01092352,0.001144207,0.001913658,0.003795682,0.0007298941,0.002817158,0.003071609,0.001517404,0.002099399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05740981,0.0007615747,0.00112522,0.003365133,0.001199199,0.004453019,0.002478785,0.002253431,0.000473242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001165206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00203079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003339188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00195273,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876802,0.006244607,0.0008974067,0.001932483,0.002900768,0.0003445003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626703,0.024818,0.002728218,0.002157752,0.007093636,0.0005321034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001280063,0.0003383398,0.005507298,0.0008245079,0.0005216651,0.0002048949,0.0006505792,0.2504814,0.01426191,0.02939644,0.003120753,0.6934121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002573474,0.0001886504,0.0006494712,0.00003938667,0.00006173036,0.00009693922,0.0000412437,0.9816259,0.003147693,0.01357928,0.0005124921,0.00003140793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00731918,0.00009767859,0.9917634,0.00007346761,0.00001510048,0.00005129702,0.00006784193,0.0001990541,0.000413031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2557858,0.0001206773,0.7427698,0.00008129939,0.00006131524,0.0002723727,0.0003315031,0.00007597511,0.0005012985],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01092352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05776978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3771253653367559,"score_gpt":0.4049673486431912,"score_spread":0.02784198330643534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}