{"id":"W2121347402","doi":"10.1016/j.mcm.2011.03.026","title":"An LP-based inconsistency monitoring of pairwise comparison matrices","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical and Computer Modelling","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hungarian Scientific Research Fund","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Consistency (knowledge bases); Decision maker; Matrix (chemical analysis); Process (computing); Linear programming; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Statistics; Discrete mathematics; Operations research","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001714413,0.0001982239,0.0005862941,0.0002857359,0.0001226174,0.0002188062,0.000674404,0.00008908663,0.0001553361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008827214,0.0001412294,0.0001167312,0.0003103509,0.0001090261,0.0003169715,0.0001706754,0.0001331941,0.00004963902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009690732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002217113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001253265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.412091e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969263,0.0001810162,0.001209907,0.0004980509,0.0009350699,0.0002496683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973366,0.001240381,0.000324124,0.0006436346,0.0002590697,0.0001962379],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004711906,0.004249503,0.1187102,0.0006793275,0.0001175124,0.00009536493,0.03191832,0.2101324,0.001268016,0.1009634,0.0002207581,0.531174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002242375,0.0001009865,0.0007618667,0.0001451228,0.00001483144,0.000004645854,0.000280159,0.8928195,0.0007975282,0.1046755,0.00002437831,0.0001512317],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4369703,0.00008169738,0.5624701,0.00000962231,0.0001047793,0.00007656197,0.000001611289,0.00003516097,0.0002501969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5876665,0.000001855517,0.412242,0.0000154004,0.0000531773,0.000003344149,2.769319e-7,0.000008964955,0.000008497639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6826871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5759168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3771253653367559,"score_gpt":0.4049673486431912,"score_spread":0.02784198330643534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}