{"id":"W2121420104","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2009.04.040","title":"A role for human reliability analysis (HRA) in preventing drinking water incidents and securing safe drinking water","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Research","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Human error; Reliability (semiconductor); Human reliability; Water supply; Water quality; Water safety; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental health; Water source; Business; Engineering; Water resource management; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Environmental engineering; Medicine; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03870152,0.001160908,0.000732159,0.002376842,0.002424886,0.004526063,0.001770477,0.002450504,0.004849893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1001773,0.0006531196,0.001046173,0.0009659123,0.004179633,0.005474981,0.001804354,0.002704107,0.001223305],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002204053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01118004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01134573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0111951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9743527,0.01921849,0.0009052983,0.001500802,0.003454102,0.0005685926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7622685,0.1650318,0.01644598,0.01508626,0.03688848,0.004278949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007526678,0.0008808411,0.1494485,0.001656456,0.0004349851,0.0003715629,0.005306982,0.01031509,0.01034135,0.09005214,0.02016466,0.7102747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003871578,0.004360504,0.2858319,0.005437494,0.001316944,0.002841244,0.01746296,0.1540792,0.02330326,0.3609881,0.1431738,0.0008173608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2232793,0.03086006,0.5423116,0.104094,0.003722725,0.0007436083,0.0004286031,0.002396891,0.09216329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8683696,0.00304742,0.12085,0.002958993,0.0007902458,0.0002001062,0.00004646185,0.0001327869,0.003604345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03870152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2046756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1055674770397696,"score_gpt":0.5036752642895475,"score_spread":0.3981077872497779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}