{"id":"W2121420497","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3987","title":"DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF A COMPOSITE REBAR FOR THE REINFORCEMENT OF CONCRETE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reinforcement; Rebar; Interlock; Structural engineering; Composite number; Rod; Finite element method; Materials science; Tension (geology); Cylinder; RADIUS; Composite material; Compression (physics); Engineering; Computer science; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005221608,0.0008883901,0.0005605582,0.0007701567,0.0002094197,0.0005433076,0.0005246489,0.0007827511,0.00212166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004953177,0.0004664377,0.0005452722,0.0002566409,0.0002777117,0.0003389693,0.0003250895,0.0003767643,0.0005060898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004479854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000467334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005670637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001427308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997602,0.00005762152,0.000007584575,0.00003721173,0.00009875425,0.00003851589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998018,0.00005674093,0.00006240712,0.00001100284,0.00005227614,0.00001570543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001460781,0.000111468,0.0006095914,0.0002561045,0.00003747762,0.0001623916,0.00005796703,0.8385969,0.1227279,0.00307732,0.0003337776,0.03388307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004302738,0.0006494148,0.001011319,0.0000306626,0.00005621898,0.0001024241,0.00005548463,0.9658476,0.0268814,0.0006667697,0.00463218,0.00002352634],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2692724,0.0009946446,0.7132393,0.0001102899,0.00007197592,0.000175298,0.00009157971,0.0004546914,0.01558986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8087467,0.0004056962,0.1840849,0.00003792167,0.000015305,0.0001638602,0.00008445849,0.0001518921,0.006309244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00212166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007097661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01459230228738212,"score_gpt":0.1915860974893396,"score_spread":0.1769937952019575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}