{"id":"W2121435312","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00956.x","title":"Urbanisation viewed through a geostatistical lens applied to remote-sensing data","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Area","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Remote sensing; Variogram; Land cover; Urbanization; Change detection; Land use; Feature (linguistics); Geography; Variance (accounting); Geostatistics; Cover (algebra); Environmental science; Cartography; Physical geography; Computer science; Kriging; Spatial variability; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009857758,0.0002057868,0.0001942452,0.002638418,0.0002557164,0.002543112,0.0001408072,0.0001101446,0.002942122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003014388,0.0001241129,0.000277658,0.002707043,0.000795639,0.0008460403,0.0006644489,0.0004363177,0.0003131868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006880869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006388985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008868333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01018018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996703,0.0001683869,0.00001945593,0.0000408644,0.00007867435,0.00002240434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990017,0.0006776266,0.0001272814,0.00007313111,0.00008404136,0.00003619013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000207735,0.00006186897,0.09581312,0.0004796887,0.000178833,0.0008003723,0.006248971,0.04058196,0.01497938,0.5460403,0.007246341,0.2873614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006468653,0.0003315839,0.2624408,0.000313005,0.0001507667,0.001690939,0.01800372,0.2987889,0.01659123,0.2117377,0.1897524,0.0001341825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3759884,0.001441438,0.5551245,0.002429562,0.0002661897,0.0001733048,0.003501603,0.001525725,0.05954937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.895528,0.0008138531,0.09927301,0.0001263817,0.0001455021,0.0000965323,0.0005256813,0.0001832006,0.003307759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008868333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01763344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04224343609986375,"score_gpt":0.2603391318081489,"score_spread":0.2180956957082851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}