{"id":"W2121468671","doi":"10.1115/1.4003849","title":"Stiffness Analysis of a 2DOF Planar Tensegrity Mechanism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics","topic":"Structural Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Tensegrity; Stiffness; Mechanism (biology); Planar; Workspace; Structural engineering; Direct stiffness method; Stiffness matrix; Compliant mechanism; Computer science; Engineering; Materials science; Finite element method; Physics; Robot; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000200247,0.0004374142,0.0003169022,0.0005370966,0.0001797734,0.0003148156,0.0004149978,0.0005523915,0.0026431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004725856,0.0001957449,0.0004096504,0.0001893432,0.0003671355,0.0004582142,0.0004050966,0.0001960817,0.0003520303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001700424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002683587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007587756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004452921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999079,0.00001252479,0.000004124806,0.00001837025,0.00004327584,0.00001376385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998515,0.00004930025,0.00004660795,0.00001752545,0.00002831156,0.000006735869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001527241,0.00002143666,0.001154337,0.0001461094,0.00003542855,0.0005064738,0.0001405573,0.8436736,0.1066675,0.01742974,0.0002283907,0.02984364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001272508,0.0001762743,0.001484717,0.00001181111,0.00001283552,0.0002409196,0.00004875479,0.9891059,0.00560948,0.002223124,0.001051621,0.00002173898],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.274428,0.0004063141,0.7132372,0.0001186825,0.00002099078,0.00004941669,0.00009825331,0.0002805385,0.01136053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812657,0.0002181898,0.01405388,0.0000147733,0.000006773276,0.00003785422,0.00004500498,0.00001670156,0.004341119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008842051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01705584780933517,"score_gpt":0.1950925171607321,"score_spread":0.1780366693513969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}