{"id":"W2121468671","doi":"10.1115/1.4003849","title":"Stiffness Analysis of a 2DOF Planar Tensegrity Mechanism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics","topic":"Structural Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Tensegrity; Stiffness; Mechanism (biology); Planar; Workspace; Structural engineering; Direct stiffness method; Stiffness matrix; Compliant mechanism; Computer science; Engineering; Materials science; Finite element method; Physics; Robot; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001794783,0.0001007744,0.0004031906,0.0003221735,0.00002940238,0.00001101537,0.00008998009,0.00008352576,0.00007597445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001243401,0.00007422966,0.0001660498,0.0003834127,0.00001493969,0.000101506,0.00001148311,0.0001157181,2.865577e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001408148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008167541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001381412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001056811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992427,0.00001625594,0.0003934822,0.00006169356,0.0001797789,0.000106073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994628,0.00001787464,0.0001900939,0.00008804561,0.0001624233,0.00007876542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002984987,0.0000416894,0.0001535865,0.00005793683,0.002418974,0.00003069845,0.0006529102,0.9258946,0.01096961,0.05675495,0.00005854321,0.00293666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005205104,0.0001968444,0.01190499,0.00005879372,0.005272127,0.00008490746,0.0004743779,0.9410255,0.00723287,0.03295073,0.00001417555,0.000264158],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07204229,0.0005400135,0.9267601,0.00004316261,0.0004264222,0.00003815049,0.00001075038,0.00001606856,0.000122985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8119463,0.0006622647,0.1872945,0.00001859652,0.00003554652,2.07058e-7,0.000002542134,0.00001073931,0.0000292958],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.739904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3026998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01705584780933517,"score_gpt":0.1950925171607321,"score_spread":0.1780366693513969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}