{"id":"W2121568877","doi":"10.1016/j.amc.2006.06.030","title":"A note on DEA efficiency assessment using ideal point: An improvement of Wang and Luo’s model","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Mathematics and Computation","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Data envelopment analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Ideal solution; Ideal (ethics); Computation; Ideal point; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Similarity (geometry); Point (geometry); Mathematics; Operations research; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001511743,0.0001397004,0.0002911346,0.0002408576,0.0001772606,0.0001677944,0.0001407333,0.00004809365,0.00000325252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003517897,0.0001093681,0.00003966652,0.0003315653,0.00008736928,0.00009397874,0.00007457745,0.00006773247,0.000002130926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003672667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004908069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004310866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010529,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979303,0.00001717994,0.0006818002,0.0003651439,0.0008503502,0.0001552103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987787,0.0003667939,0.000432869,0.0002334928,0.0001391381,0.00004900896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009028234,0.0004361997,0.00003493781,0.00003931132,0.000007587102,7.634707e-7,0.001113408,0.7596686,0.04467936,0.1581952,0.00001792188,0.03579764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002165069,0.00007385369,0.000248575,0.0000146188,0.0000273717,0.000001341027,0.0002654047,0.7504073,0.0008206716,0.2478352,0.000001146298,0.0000879947],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4919994,0.00000787732,0.5065713,0.00003160433,0.00001127317,0.0001212191,0.000001998387,0.000009812218,0.001245521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8149716,0.000001034819,0.1849427,0.00004855551,0.00001234575,0.000003906903,0.000003701696,0.000008147626,0.000008008436],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3229722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04995759405450428,"score_gpt":0.3713083180973101,"score_spread":0.3213507240428058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}