{"id":"W2121762305","doi":"10.1177/0971097320060101","title":"The Quality of Citations in JIAFM: Where do we stand?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yardstick; Credibility; Citation; Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Library science; Social science; Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09691449,0.00069111,0.002782875,0.03234885,0.004691765,0.01984913,0.003709932,0.002597886,0.003051783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3347355,0.0004269019,0.0008536177,0.05562641,0.01108055,0.01751397,0.004945375,0.003578942,0.001339799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007333323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009597519,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01881952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03231595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9003134,0.03264981,0.02070305,0.003582847,0.04072699,0.00202397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6610149,0.1654909,0.0651041,0.01308064,0.08845127,0.006858295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003645262,0.000168376,0.3333114,0.004622359,0.0007137557,0.0004961979,0.03333178,0.0003987077,0.0009919368,0.04492959,0.03437377,0.5462977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008351699,0.001017902,0.5695974,0.01506176,0.001021904,0.002508489,0.0794033,0.002899877,0.002795335,0.1150243,0.2100451,0.0005411914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2169933,0.3855142,0.02921233,0.2753364,0.01366598,0.0007392869,0.002626169,0.0006134295,0.07529897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9057803,0.04574155,0.02950022,0.006558371,0.006230786,0.0003446012,0.0008304153,0.0002635881,0.004750194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9676511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5125389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0502999745305262,"score_gpt":0.3162886335019544,"score_spread":0.2659886589714281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}