{"id":"W2121840047","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.399","title":"Primary proximal urethral adenocarcinoma: Case report and brief review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","topic":"Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adenocarcinoma; Medicine; Urethra; Pelvic exenteration; Prostatic adenocarcinoma; General surgery; Surgery; Cancer; Urology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003301826,0.001606292,0.001578043,0.004377924,0.001414286,0.001704064,0.001443372,0.004179619,0.003326084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001218327,0.0006392006,0.0009397835,0.003332622,0.001383356,0.002688038,0.001290306,0.002144773,0.001966079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007947201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007518486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009558357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001742208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994461,0.00006793681,0.0001384772,0.0001296306,0.000115269,0.0001026657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992037,0.00023621,0.0002743744,0.00003671401,0.00008036279,0.0001686393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003315131,0.00009846353,0.005413646,0.00171804,0.00005347507,0.9541777,0.0002602805,0.0001593223,0.001204728,0.0003459124,0.009049959,0.0274854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003360309,0.00003857608,0.002490433,0.0002061644,0.0000321307,0.985759,0.0002027427,0.00004731753,0.0001203658,0.0001644697,0.01091893,0.00001640273],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0919577,0.872802,0.003954417,0.008163948,0.006133682,0.0002358856,0.0003625579,0.0002816485,0.01610813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2899247,0.6636041,0.003383406,0.006744426,0.02856598,0.0001183318,0.0004564245,0.00004378373,0.007158712],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004377924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01112688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01688344612537105,"score_gpt":0.2464943405108184,"score_spread":0.2296108943854474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}