{"id":"W2121890305","doi":"10.1111/j.1473-4192.2012.00315.x","title":"A variationist study of compliment responses in Chinese","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politeness; Variation (astronomy); Linguistics; Sociolinguistics; Psychology; Mandarin Chinese; Conjunction (astronomy); Maxim; Situated; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001410956,0.0002005899,0.0002416071,0.001430911,0.001015276,0.0006870352,0.0003793942,0.0002058599,0.0008685791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004769755,0.000174676,0.0001806818,0.00184753,0.001574707,0.0004904278,0.0008406434,0.0002663986,0.0000566659],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001201973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008116405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02211931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02959971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988325,0.00052872,0.00007856413,0.0002156225,0.0002247101,0.0001198464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976836,0.001543632,0.0002822178,0.0001919234,0.0002113293,0.0000872174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003416897,0.0001187201,0.418508,0.000393069,0.00009137459,0.002178561,0.4355214,0.0009095514,0.0498744,0.01193138,0.0004151486,0.07971664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001236785,0.0001863971,0.9389582,0.0000175638,0.0000347885,0.0009928565,0.04672413,0.002808189,0.004809313,0.001032114,0.004374665,0.0000494515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979558,0.00003327993,0.0005184953,0.00001567894,0.000001110876,0.00001166029,0.00002550668,0.000002086353,0.001436398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991955,0.00003211377,0.0003810614,0.000004871833,0.000002529834,0.00001712795,0.00004718334,0.000002692006,0.000316927],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02211931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04398113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04783128510976078,"score_gpt":0.3487326121576681,"score_spread":0.3009013270479073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}