{"id":"W2121907597","doi":"10.1139/f00-225","title":"The Precautionary Approach and risk management: can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Risk management; Fishing; Fish stock; Fisheries management; Business; Portfolio; Stock (firearms); Equity (law); Fishery; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Actuarial science; Economics; Finance; Ecology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001859344,0.00008798239,0.0001228182,0.00006886292,0.0006449328,0.0002058408,0.0005027305,0.00002250776,0.000191802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001334275,0.00004745602,0.00002644065,0.0004458932,0.00211498,0.0003086108,0.0001255588,0.000134067,3.629408e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004876264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007616845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06525031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1762431,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987915,0.0001600196,0.0002837264,0.0001611665,0.0003212007,0.0002823979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993296,0.0001878092,0.0001443926,0.0001509695,0.000009746683,0.0001774596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001646745,0.00001307071,0.9052938,0.00001868336,0.00001580589,0.0000188046,0.0006590768,0.00003055956,2.806449e-7,0.000660727,0.0004969326,0.09277578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002854741,0.0001624341,0.9081082,0.00002696078,0.00003044312,0.00007839128,0.008440335,0.001584204,0.000001496574,0.02420196,0.05695444,0.0001256034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8300466,0.0002483675,0.00002002895,0.002476963,0.00004129273,0.0002314409,0.000002737156,0.000001294933,0.1669313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99532,0.003029916,0.0007541623,0.00006864281,0.00001431544,0.00001054069,4.420786e-7,0.000003333991,0.0007986382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1661326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9409742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01631716576572423,"score_gpt":0.2134993849852549,"score_spread":0.1971822192195307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}