{"id":"W2121977230","doi":"10.22230/jem.2005v6n2a311","title":"Assessing success at achieving biodiversity objectives in managed forests","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecosystems and Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptive management; Forest management; Environmental resource management; Process (computing); Ecosystem management; Work (physics); Sustainable forest management; Business; Plan (archaeology); Management process; Computer science; Management by objectives; Process management; Risk analysis (engineering); Management system; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Operations management; Engineering; Ecology; Geography; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01106485,0.000275065,0.0003307084,0.004791344,0.002513849,0.003262121,0.0009213967,0.0005998522,0.001497276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02259361,0.000211812,0.0001854764,0.00515906,0.001506687,0.001848864,0.001737899,0.0005910334,0.0002286823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01281317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01137152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3663022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7301025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992532,0.002114331,0.0004829357,0.0002232628,0.003750653,0.0008968522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834056,0.004689645,0.0037606,0.0006428789,0.005649511,0.001851784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001601627,0.0003445863,0.7986763,0.0003021207,0.00007721834,0.0001555622,0.005069375,0.004810067,0.0009843047,0.004727967,0.004838253,0.1798541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000153142,0.0002650217,0.9817454,0.0002304723,0.00002539676,0.00002694899,0.004753413,0.002687209,0.0009345298,0.002738425,0.006536323,0.00004152312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9288415,0.001039994,0.002953997,0.001525479,0.00002028554,0.0006800812,0.001185225,0.00007562979,0.0636779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841098,0.0009616542,0.009278322,0.0001631155,0.00001679376,0.0003137633,0.0006347708,0.00001052824,0.004511249],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3663022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7283401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01293226622891962,"score_gpt":0.2462092535633502,"score_spread":0.2332769873344305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}