{"id":"W2122040608","doi":"10.1139/t02-057","title":"Stability analysis of two-dimensional excavated slopes considering strength anisotropy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anisotropy; Geotechnical engineering; Slip (aerodynamics); Geology; Finite element method; Slope stability analysis; Slope stability; Stress (linguistics); Boundary value problem; Limiting; Friction angle; Factor of safety; Geometry; Structural engineering; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003632768,0.0002598422,0.000633153,0.0009312797,0.0001350144,0.00005729708,0.0003291918,0.0002026099,0.002734866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002042986,0.0002566501,0.000452033,0.001829954,0.0001213108,0.0001177054,0.00003054569,0.0008089887,0.00002308818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003179271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006808471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00260479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001948906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980178,0.0000474406,0.0007209374,0.0002430544,0.0003495704,0.0006211724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983046,0.0001283933,0.00008121659,0.0004154933,0.0001532198,0.000917069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001502019,0.0000232348,0.0002452861,0.00001113678,0.0007744824,0.00007096657,0.00002011384,0.9915342,0.003380504,0.0001396099,0.0007023196,0.003096622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002846066,0.00003341077,0.001068015,0.00003056616,0.000636395,0.0000602013,0.00001746105,0.9939104,0.001100141,0.0001336817,0.002423549,0.0003015203],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8933878,0.002429637,0.1006541,0.0008496594,0.0004596857,0.0002306159,0.000274268,0.0008533999,0.0008608866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968382,0.00007284206,0.002895603,0.00005837638,0.00006082941,0.00000343414,0.00001254739,0.00003198854,0.00002620248],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1034504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01500695617034345,"score_gpt":0.2005660343324599,"score_spread":0.1855590781621164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}