{"id":"W2122115541","doi":"10.1109/tkde.2003.1232279","title":"Reasoning about uniqueness constraints in object relational databases","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering","topic":"Advanced Database Systems and Queries","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Relational database; Uniqueness; Generalization; Functional dependency; Theoretical computer science; Relational model; Object (grammar); Simple (philosophy); Relational calculus; Representation (politics); Core (optical fiber); Database; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003239867,0.0001511504,0.0001554263,0.0001846894,0.0001105439,0.00002974046,0.000216392,0.0000378224,0.00001503164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003752255,0.0001544509,0.00001769558,0.000338648,0.00003985319,0.001330692,0.00001086124,0.0002014133,0.00001228939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003319182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008628162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002430684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001031501,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989988,0.0000450065,0.0002188565,0.0004306944,0.00009606243,0.0002105588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989429,0.0001974243,0.0000288507,0.0007225881,0.00002847024,0.00007974446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002082106,0.0003587111,0.0004978266,0.0003366191,0.00009053561,0.0001084164,0.001276762,0.07564534,0.003143865,0.8272402,0.0002580533,0.09102286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002491991,0.0001106753,0.002533826,0.002035897,0.00004031451,0.0005466562,0.0002695913,0.7313642,0.02453581,0.0001558657,0.2342546,0.00166056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001849393,0.0006934349,0.9959232,0.000009989182,0.0004327511,0.0001044782,0.0002748459,0.0001112249,0.000600722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7825868,0.0002125459,0.2169214,0.00001755516,0.00002950729,0.00002968826,0.00007477177,0.00001807765,0.000109706],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8270843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6298327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03363073257960945,"score_gpt":0.2797861886679333,"score_spread":0.2461554560883238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}