{"id":"W2122141032","doi":"10.1186/2046-4053-2-14","title":"Impact of quality improvement strategies on the quality of life and well-being of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review protocol","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Systematic Reviews","topic":"Spinal Cord Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; CINAHL; PsycINFO; Spinal cord injury; Quality of life (healthcare); MEDLINE; Protocol (science); Quality management; Critical appraisal; Health care; Systematic review; Physical therapy; Nursing; Psychological intervention; Alternative medicine; Spinal cord; Psychiatry; Management system; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1147117,0.006651662,0.02128899,0.01812258,0.00520123,0.009126068,0.006914173,0.008093822,0.05391955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1192627,0.006672422,0.01802973,0.01738338,0.005430339,0.01034424,0.006843849,0.006549309,0.007114072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02260419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1072246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008269536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01692303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9386692,0.02463265,0.02221458,0.004264499,0.007587957,0.002631176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9254203,0.02802881,0.01595721,0.005434239,0.02176067,0.003398753],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004268449,0.0003563805,0.0009880919,0.9378898,0.002703797,0.0003914998,0.002022245,0.0008184976,0.0007966802,0.002764784,0.01446998,0.03252972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02904228,0.003113539,0.008743588,0.805135,0.02018877,0.0006590735,0.003525508,0.002103576,0.002574718,0.006552068,0.1177653,0.0005965549],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004438536,0.001931365,0.00086756,0.0003154358,0.0001101945,0.9938428,0.002098349,0.00006559909,0.0003247705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004847505,0.001321665,0.002497809,0.0001292485,0.00001445457,0.9950578,0.000330678,0.00000620617,0.0001573818],"genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1147117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6066608,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2196516086779744,"score_gpt":0.5411887186156528,"score_spread":0.3215371099376784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}