{"id":"W2122187852","doi":"10.1002/rra.1550","title":"DEVELOPMENT OF AN INFLOW‐CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW REGIME FOR A NORWEGIAN RIVER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"River Research and Applications","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Inflow; Hydropower; Flow (mathematics); Environmental flow; Environmental science; Norwegian; Work (physics); Current (fluid); Natural (archaeology); Variable (mathematics); Hydrology (agriculture); Geology; Ecology; Oceanography; Engineering; Climatology; Mathematics; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001131005,0.0001906362,0.0002546845,0.0004555855,0.0003665765,0.0006183005,0.0004602195,0.0002288933,0.001248661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001054054,0.0001839225,0.0002444341,0.0002484091,0.0003281719,0.0003237163,0.0004925029,0.0002186849,0.0001674497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005913118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008628697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005022127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004512351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995887,0.0001227415,0.00004615001,0.00009795744,0.000103233,0.00004131797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995808,0.00009808483,0.00009803264,0.00004491211,0.0001381647,0.00004007115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007360805,0.001035802,0.03119077,0.0004346656,0.00007162161,0.0002740641,0.0006298001,0.5052935,0.2309472,0.011038,0.001593275,0.2167552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002646275,0.002924633,0.04551497,0.0001179569,0.0001020973,0.0001023658,0.0002804289,0.8307151,0.09607688,0.002543005,0.02120523,0.0001526611],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6738488,0.0001208656,0.3144585,0.0001366662,0.00007044854,0.0004897033,0.0002518489,0.001157974,0.009465105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9176162,0.00008175437,0.08005751,0.00002501067,0.00001044167,0.000290142,0.0001746913,0.00004328637,0.001701029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005022127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009985805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04459317182847242,"score_gpt":0.2878815223623787,"score_spread":0.2432883505339063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}