{"id":"W2122264634","doi":"10.1139/f01-112","title":"Is catch-per-unit-effort proportional to abundance?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":610,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Catch per unit effort; Statistics; Mathematics; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Series (stratigraphy); Fishery; Econometrics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009601029,0.0005726265,0.001443009,0.002133707,0.0002925771,0.001940833,0.001474554,0.001376945,0.003224678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08234679,0.0007046785,0.0008687377,0.00394421,0.002658257,0.00503276,0.001161289,0.001031728,0.0009715659],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007814774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003843399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005525946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002320444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936349,0.00164435,0.0006158074,0.003047986,0.000766008,0.0002908315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9474553,0.03060941,0.01258457,0.006411481,0.002325735,0.0006134195],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000132767,0.00003354003,0.8892282,0.0003330377,0.001881381,0.0001248857,0.0003598614,0.003632925,0.0005092501,0.005208061,0.001201556,0.09735448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001942649,0.0001661136,0.9641236,0.0001501447,0.0003787912,0.0007724872,0.0002924432,0.01138802,0.0005240751,0.01851494,0.003592108,0.00007792266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8661939,0.02717397,0.07537996,0.0069377,0.000721366,0.0001278782,0.001853921,0.0005002497,0.02111102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928796,0.002297577,0.002504357,0.0007262183,0.0003502857,0.00003664511,0.0003413445,0.00008059375,0.0007833762],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009601029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05077571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02331967245810668,"score_gpt":0.2353657383342404,"score_spread":0.2120460658761337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}