{"id":"W2122356685","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2001.007","title":"Evaluation of Particle Removal at Water Treatment Plants in Nova Scotia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Fecal contamination and water quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Turbidity; Nova scotia; Raw water; Particle (ecology); Water treatment; Particle counter; Environmental science; Filtration (mathematics); Water quality; Ultrafiltration (renal); Microfiltration; Particulates; Environmental engineering; Pulp and paper industry; Chemistry; Chromatography; Membrane; Ecology; Engineering; Geology; Biology; Oceanography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003472051,0.000355997,0.0003087787,0.0005673646,0.001232424,0.0006221789,0.0003523568,0.0003078241,0.0007072624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005942533,0.0002677461,0.0002826195,0.0004630118,0.0005287416,0.0001321841,0.0003244287,0.0002580357,0.0002036074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005733611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003823025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.744054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8395316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995951,0.00003918691,0.00001873619,0.00007970058,0.0001567503,0.0001106201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998894,0.0001283866,0.0001874491,0.00004301444,0.0005839404,0.000163215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002321686,0.0006079387,0.5796793,0.000516057,0.0001729433,0.002382747,0.002662261,0.006026405,0.37309,0.0001827241,0.0007953804,0.03156251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003227416,0.0007622929,0.9750081,0.00001489881,0.00003632992,0.0001276727,0.0009100684,0.00173651,0.01988873,0.00001999292,0.001443074,0.00002001505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986746,0.00006456246,0.0002974292,0.00001545528,0.000004023721,0.0000560321,0.0001513734,0.00001389779,0.0007225248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955474,0.00009849984,0.0009390758,0.00003375724,0.000002016297,0.00003440506,0.0003285574,0.000005376398,0.003010874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.255946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5149066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3403380270507745,"score_gpt":0.45966626518182,"score_spread":0.1193282381310455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}