{"id":"W2122358298","doi":"10.1109/wpc.2003.1199195","title":"Identifying comprehension bottlenecks using program slicing and cognitive complexity metrics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Program slicing; Computer science; Program comprehension; Software quality; Software engineering; Software maintenance; Software metric; Software construction; Software system; Slicing; Software; Static program analysis; Software development; Verification and validation; Quality (philosophy); Programming language; Engineering; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002841448,0.0001302959,0.0001587138,0.0003034041,0.000197036,0.0003466197,0.0003075679,0.00005098115,0.000004140482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003678806,0.0001252762,0.00003364063,0.001034569,0.00008880081,0.0004586223,0.0005506421,0.0002006683,0.00001104771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008926099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005081305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003009257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000108673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998655,0.00003193941,0.0001643727,0.0003782478,0.0004130653,0.0003573869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989682,0.0004605884,0.00003589543,0.0002343552,0.0001621221,0.0001388441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003743584,0.001112921,0.1374118,0.0007410392,0.0003246286,0.0004841593,0.006103171,0.008760787,0.02161681,0.09291355,0.00008093311,0.7304128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003038381,0.000441893,0.3146057,0.0006644229,0.00004428421,0.0003655209,0.0003805974,0.6423674,0.02454877,0.01235373,0.0001393925,0.001049837],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4293705,0.0001479671,0.5697133,0.00003691775,0.00008865684,0.0001843198,4.362467e-7,0.0003969237,0.00006097934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6559053,0.000005393476,0.3440129,0.00003774166,0.00001798605,0.000004809531,0.000001005053,0.000008340735,0.000006465615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7293629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5108616,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1272920998473706,"score_gpt":0.3655375368444781,"score_spread":0.2382454369971075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}