{"id":"W2122401796","doi":"10.1509/jmkr.39.1.47.18930","title":"The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking during New Product Ideation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":619,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Analogy; New product development; Ideation; Context (archaeology); Product (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Empirical research; Psychology; Cognition; Process (computing); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Creativity; Marketing; Social psychology; Business; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0118677,0.00004573073,0.00008178165,0.0001293701,0.0001768208,0.00010478,0.0001759342,0.0000248679,0.00005450962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009306874,0.00003175004,0.00002274868,0.0002763497,0.00004605375,0.0002461948,0.00002926328,0.000548085,0.000003272942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004690659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003586918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007933982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001150554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983749,0.0005854278,0.0002804616,0.00005781018,0.0005204634,0.0001808899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966173,0.002844861,0.00009716155,0.0001015168,0.0002676792,0.00007148878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002049276,0.0002922438,0.1535428,0.001601401,0.0005547432,0.0001118024,0.017954,0.06716744,0.2063675,0.004250663,0.05795739,0.4881507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004022648,0.00008495319,0.9721766,0.0003757536,0.0000159473,0.000289672,0.0008748993,0.006702429,0.001810449,0.001508671,0.01564623,0.0001121089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925784,0.00251334,0.00006971446,0.001595801,0.00009565212,0.00005982019,9.282561e-8,0.000008589101,0.003078619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963002,0.002344612,0.00072753,0.000006810881,0.000197177,6.161259e-7,3.579516e-8,0.000007216644,0.000415809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8186338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0503799837358134,"score_gpt":0.3378639093945351,"score_spread":0.2874839256587217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}