{"id":"W2122419258","doi":"10.1186/1477-7525-8-94","title":"Cross-cultural validity of four quality of life scales in persons with spinal cord injury","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","topic":"Spinal Cord Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rasch model; Quality of life (healthcare); Differential item functioning; Spinal cord injury; Cross-cultural; Comparability; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Cross-sectional study; Medicine; Psychology; Cross-cultural studies; Construct validity; Reliability (semiconductor); Gerontology; Item response theory; Psychiatry; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Spinal cord","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007804903,0.0003490174,0.0004679555,0.001624994,0.0005686764,0.001054462,0.0005257995,0.0003562491,0.0006961839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02185115,0.0002117066,0.001034239,0.001330335,0.000975958,0.0005194405,0.001411751,0.0007011861,0.00009185539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007330588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006101264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004318151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005335927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996125,0.001883307,0.0004779357,0.0002534971,0.001104013,0.0001562476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866883,0.006969309,0.003047969,0.0006300484,0.002197617,0.0004667466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001164027,0.00008729997,0.9776016,0.0001014266,0.0005103996,0.00004812655,0.002934538,0.0003438074,0.0002197825,0.0001574719,0.0001579748,0.01772113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000154727,0.0001642158,0.9952768,0.00009623414,0.00006070957,0.0001158915,0.002440625,0.0009612064,0.0001544815,0.0002377336,0.0004615518,0.00001505795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975762,0.0004515115,0.0004212805,0.000106552,0.0000232455,0.00006145113,0.0001609953,0.000005556772,0.001193419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989111,0.0001622704,0.000602902,0.00002431394,0.000004067361,0.00005601218,0.0001786056,0.000002040257,0.00005876132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007804903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04127675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3098733976476211,"score_gpt":0.545450648994938,"score_spread":0.2355772513473169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}