{"id":"W2122423682","doi":"10.1017/s0266462308080185","title":"Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":228,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics","funders":"University of Glasgow; Australian Government","keywords":"Systematic review; Health technology; Context (archaeology); MEDLINE; Grey literature; Cochrane Library; Management science; Medicine; Psychology; Health care; Political science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7313337,0.003122315,0.01052909,0.05661839,0.004882759,0.04159233,0.00546984,0.007505045,0.002742263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8448765,0.004674922,0.008406313,0.06351639,0.01794645,0.04113647,0.01631025,0.008177438,0.0008125706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03738793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06519764,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003804216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00999526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.136335,0.6199822,0.1527147,0.01069753,0.07835136,0.001919225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.04991678,0.8277943,0.06686676,0.01373144,0.04017259,0.001518168],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008594929,0.0001686167,0.008892397,0.4507396,0.006184597,0.0001724737,0.02875111,0.001385805,0.0006679196,0.0335327,0.00714064,0.4615047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005364761,0.001067901,0.009476645,0.8636648,0.007450312,0.0009462258,0.01494294,0.002930318,0.0006218113,0.03418631,0.06364339,0.0005328173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004951613,0.9384462,0.03023516,0.01643458,0.001870898,0.004795146,0.0002553263,0.0001256445,0.00288542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09403565,0.67426,0.1953766,0.01141996,0.001747933,0.02230462,0.0002842384,0.0001962658,0.0003747109],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2686663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3313135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5979690763073291,"score_gpt":0.6496716904767957,"score_spread":0.05170261416946664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}