{"id":"W2122472002","doi":"10.1139/x11-174","title":"Optimising stand management on peatlands: the case of northern Finland","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peat; Ditch; Scots pine; Silviculture; Forest management; Environmental science; Boreal; Forestry; Taiga; Drainage; Agroforestry; Geography; Ecology; Pinus <genus>","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00211639,0.00008073758,0.0001020021,0.0002907111,0.0003092786,0.00006434728,0.0004080853,0.00003136162,0.001254493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007192295,0.00005140345,0.00005952368,0.0004079258,0.0003436638,0.0001726116,0.00006801787,0.000285268,0.0002100723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002661879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007652126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01659297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106764,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986074,0.000126641,0.0002109961,0.00007751357,0.0004083354,0.0005690956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990166,0.0001126538,0.00008570412,0.0002420911,0.00004025339,0.0005026788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005094551,0.00004089204,0.9246854,0.00003294657,0.00005739291,0.001742245,0.00207063,0.004374996,0.000004454752,0.002875478,0.05099247,0.01307218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001113498,0.0007067538,0.5940725,0.0001728027,0.00005795637,0.00113977,0.00177451,0.0003586062,0.00007187774,0.001338832,0.3989292,0.0002637514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8993776,0.0002263326,0.0000111835,0.0006777975,0.00008922519,0.000148811,0.000005476091,8.910521e-7,0.09946273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956775,0.0000377662,0.0001017692,0.00004186174,0.0001454422,0.000002077746,0.000001050053,0.00001038467,0.00398217],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3479367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0465880452440459,"score_gpt":0.3130401167423447,"score_spread":0.2664520714982987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}