{"id":"W2122521094","doi":"10.1139/f99-261","title":"Genetic relationships among populations of northern pike (<i>Esox lucius</i>)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources; Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Esox; Pike; Refugium (fishkeeping); Biology; Population; Microsatellite; Ecology; Genetic variation; Genetic distance; UPGMA; Sympatry; Coregonus; Zoology; Geography; Sympatric speciation; Demography; Fishery; Genetics; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003714136,0.000146258,0.0001775388,0.0006989894,0.0004887827,0.0003316778,0.0001614385,0.0001358506,0.0004691905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006001524,0.0001187757,0.0001004281,0.0004331454,0.0004704027,0.0001859343,0.0002641399,0.0001234103,0.00008038917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001036808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004122774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05618782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1391319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998355,0.00003025076,0.00001422475,0.00006691587,0.00002858659,0.00002453475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996215,0.00006296643,0.0001472231,0.00001939699,0.00007696026,0.0000719436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000170335,0.00006194647,0.9769912,0.00001685547,0.0000739141,0.0001134761,0.001169671,0.0004664788,0.01387933,0.00008393835,0.0000597915,0.006913144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006398117,0.00005069455,0.9990299,0.000002416028,0.000009756279,0.00007010548,0.0001840515,0.0002771731,0.0002026943,0.00002857378,0.0001348334,0.000003441136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998263,0.00001602472,0.00004414695,0.000002044999,1.768314e-7,0.000001751606,0.000020847,0.000001262653,0.00008762287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995166,0.00001450403,0.0002245425,0.000004584014,5.281834e-7,0.000004297741,0.0001319208,8.070536e-7,0.0001022703],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9438122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1117215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02645996413766238,"score_gpt":0.2132705667738071,"score_spread":0.1868106026361447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}