{"id":"W2122526865","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2005.08.009","title":"Monitoring small-scale marine fisheries: An example from Thailand's Ko Chang archipelago","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fisheries Research","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Research Council of Thailand; University of Victoria","keywords":"Fishery; Fishing; Archipelago; Fisheries management; Stock assessment; Geography; Marine protected area; Scale (ratio); Fisheries science; Sustainability; Overfishing; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006240832,0.0002336367,0.0002894074,0.00006481862,0.000651021,0.0002121692,0.0006342993,0.00009188384,0.009213485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005933003,0.0002048917,0.00006538287,0.0003860521,0.0003558303,0.0006017969,0.002355046,0.0004493723,0.000668451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002276612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001748641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1106199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1237537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972212,0.0001970122,0.0002931984,0.0006698128,0.0007382095,0.0008805264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987763,0.0002215017,0.00004862366,0.0006374707,0.00004110443,0.0002749694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001075234,0.0001174025,0.8198233,0.00001772812,0.00002089633,0.00001514241,0.006618681,0.000006436685,0.001343966,0.000008056487,0.006871809,0.165049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000357685,0.0002104945,0.6883677,0.00002256562,0.000005584325,0.00000377927,0.003665284,0.0002825547,0.00163936,0.0007015197,0.3044668,0.0002766752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9359557,0.00006416971,0.00003101772,0.001151554,0.0002507202,0.0003298119,0.0000162849,0.0001204912,0.06208024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722894,0.0003244258,0.003040492,0.00004983527,0.001364991,0.0002361522,0.00004912987,0.00004464635,0.02260093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.297595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1230534411846849,"score_gpt":0.2963186761748257,"score_spread":0.1732652349901407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}