{"id":"W2122600362","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-0064.2007.00179.x","title":"Rivers as resources, rivers as borders: community and transboundary management of fisheries in the Upper Zambezi River floodplains","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes","topic":"Global Maritime and Colonial Histories","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fisheries management; Livelihood; Fishing; Community management; Floodplain; Geography; Fishery; Population; Ecosystem approach; Fisheries law; Environmental resource management; Business; Ecosystem; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental science; Agriculture","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00134477,0.000318773,0.0003503925,0.001817369,0.002917799,0.0001409227,0.0009160366,0.0002277658,0.00009907953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007797849,0.0003200349,0.0002028042,0.004385717,0.009232016,0.0003804462,0.00005825597,0.0004327608,0.000003886172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002055789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002650116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9857233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972062,0.0004104644,0.0003771807,0.0003380176,0.0004736033,0.001194502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983271,0.0002961274,0.0001152721,0.0004551299,0.0001491282,0.0006572317],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002215565,0.0001118529,0.4242338,0.00018358,0.0003982694,0.0007228748,0.3863718,0.00000309955,0.000002503816,0.1469973,0.008160171,0.03259325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002991922,0.0001402976,0.2594019,0.00006103633,0.00006946478,0.000009724427,0.2691362,1.226061e-7,0.000001264226,0.008576693,0.4620452,0.000259018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9021652,0.002223001,5.827309e-7,0.002375556,0.0003440591,0.0005154785,0.0001100238,0.00004391757,0.0922222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941522,0.004141268,0.000133955,0.0010561,0.00004837543,0.00002525124,0.00002582283,0.00001987572,0.0003971037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.453885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007662685699081863,"score_gpt":0.2202106332833772,"score_spread":0.2125479475842954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}