{"id":"W2122672261","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.011","title":"Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":684,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Worcester Polytechnic Institute","keywords":"Data envelopment analysis; Returns to scale; Decomposition; Stage (stratigraphy); Efficiency; Constant (computer programming); Process (computing); Product (mathematics); Computer science; Econometrics; Additive model; Scale (ratio); Operations research; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Statistics; Production (economics); Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03343412,0.0001195168,0.0002810451,0.001943241,0.0006212296,0.0003189574,0.001288959,0.00001770593,0.001007297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01066965,0.00008787687,0.0001643982,0.002659857,0.0004353933,0.0007121277,0.0001804188,0.000809344,0.001076092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001847438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006711298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001866197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002623591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871339,0.005417423,0.001400175,0.000363484,0.005293882,0.0003910929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927678,0.002886779,0.0003077503,0.0003288249,0.003509221,0.0001996452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001526616,0.003867632,0.07535941,0.00001095723,0.0001551746,0.02367778,0.01648036,0.6282749,0.06858086,0.03049335,0.1010129,0.05056009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007544378,0.002856216,0.7855924,0.0003709692,0.00002351348,0.003008965,0.004270017,0.1026177,0.009065306,0.004381483,0.07928469,0.0009843827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9401576,0.0002004564,0.01204372,0.001428634,0.0001545143,0.0001063317,0.0000120352,0.000005257176,0.04589143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948707,0.00004528372,0.002476307,0.0001433273,0.0002671324,9.487463e-7,0.000004446395,0.00001460112,0.002177302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.710233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2300218538597624,"score_gpt":0.5026539069179089,"score_spread":0.2726320530581465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}