{"id":"W2122695788","doi":"10.1038/ejcn.2013.27","title":"Is glycaemic index (GI) a valid measure of carbohydrate quality?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition","topic":"Food composition and properties","field":"Nursing","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada; VINNOVA","keywords":"Glycaemic index; Interpretation (philosophy); Quality (philosophy); Dietary fibre; Medicine; Index (typography); Serving size; Food science; Computer science; Glycemic index; Internal medicine; Environmental health; Epistemology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004663166,0.0004086592,0.002941279,0.000346142,0.00007181825,0.00009582945,0.0006786876,0.0002712339,0.0001620563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007944896,0.0003028487,0.002302824,0.0003217127,0.0002019876,0.0002531723,0.00007592363,0.001712029,0.00022894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005952387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001169397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006055959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.02845e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9851521,0.007987113,0.005549348,0.0003185408,0.0007412019,0.0002517161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928917,0.0007262468,0.004797284,0.0004592594,0.0008475207,0.000277971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001364318,0.000592822,0.000007527,0.009583008,0.0003319971,0.00004820194,0.0000992515,6.592223e-7,0.00003961022,0.00000811452,0.01227818,0.9756463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002222113,0.003043818,0.00003464645,0.04298322,0.0008254349,0.0001538798,0.00003225233,0.000005474318,0.00003584171,0.0001439733,0.9501859,0.0003334709],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007093438,0.993039,0.000052622,0.0008567027,0.002638839,0.0004876621,0.00004407426,0.00003012705,0.002141696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01298266,0.9834692,0.0005642081,0.0004939474,0.002284402,0.0000042633,0.00002238543,0.0001067838,0.00007211501],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2934240164460549,"score_gpt":0.4521337511595332,"score_spread":0.1587097347134783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}