{"id":"W2122783425","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01199.x","title":"POLLINATION INTENSITY INFLUENCES SEX RATIOS IN DIOECIOUS RUMEX NIVALIS, A WIND-POLLINATED PLANT","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Biology; Pollen; Pollination; Sex ratio; Pollen tube; Competition (biology); Anemophily; Rumex; Botany; Pollinator; Sex allocation; Dioecy; Reproductive success; Inflorescence; Ecology; Demography; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000152961,0.0001039218,0.0001418466,0.00002223645,0.0001881923,0.00002975841,0.00008579755,0.00007530842,0.0000221271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003085975,0.00004374655,0.00003686556,0.0002914755,0.00004423039,0.0001524444,0.00003132674,0.00008444936,0.00002821962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008191646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005262264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004912882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01511177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992103,0.00004417117,0.0001899322,0.0001899607,0.0001592877,0.0002063294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997916,0.00005180555,0.00006988892,0.00001390483,0.00004987809,0.00002291868],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006871328,0.000101897,0.7599787,0.000003667581,0.000006029236,0.00001118189,0.00006914228,0.00008918947,0.23496,0.0009856001,0.002082989,0.001642914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001205994,0.00008351879,0.9943292,0.00001855036,0.000004172441,0.000006444366,0.0001944338,0.0005334354,0.001228377,0.001496213,0.001863167,0.0001218848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977513,0.0002533722,0.00000887591,0.0008288622,0.00006360809,0.0001288089,0.00004482973,0.00007221149,0.0008481292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992777,0.00002773202,0.00001282587,0.00004712643,0.0002400685,0.000004497422,0.0001245846,4.493576e-7,0.0002649816],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2343505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8432721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01955647158992288,"score_gpt":0.1925874430915689,"score_spread":0.173030971501646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}