{"id":"W2122814783","doi":"10.7326/0003-4819-144-6-200603210-00010","title":"Evaluation of the Quality of Prognosis Studies in Systematic Reviews","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Internal Medicine","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1452,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Systematic review; Data extraction; MEDLINE; Confounding; Critical appraisal; Quality (philosophy); Reliability (semiconductor); Selection bias; Medical physics; Alternative medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7047713,0.004671987,0.02307367,0.04430639,0.00391017,0.01884087,0.008700668,0.007104463,0.007040239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8969606,0.005873465,0.02676089,0.04237623,0.01246554,0.0156539,0.009283411,0.00696072,0.00120282],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03072527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04408049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008325615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009050169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1070601,0.4815315,0.3287363,0.01216428,0.06894406,0.001563897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.04676126,0.7111183,0.1542176,0.02181645,0.06435818,0.001728156],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001021666,0.00005051214,0.0105336,0.8791598,0.03670814,0.0001922178,0.003653931,0.001307573,0.000303814,0.00400626,0.005856572,0.05720598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002018769,0.0006540418,0.01880503,0.8585081,0.06616874,0.0005338007,0.002143826,0.003960113,0.001170789,0.01810956,0.02744388,0.0004833676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01354229,0.7922213,0.08131853,0.02313923,0.006997043,0.06606001,0.009275462,0.0007171152,0.00672904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2683413,0.2752212,0.2110046,0.007010578,0.00331054,0.2289866,0.00472403,0.0003864274,0.001014823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2952287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3640695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9559804914460917,"score_gpt":0.6919598889234728,"score_spread":0.2640206025226188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}