{"id":"W2122831784","doi":"10.1139/f06-077","title":"Short-term responses to watershed logging on biomass mercury and methylmercury accumulation by periphyton in boreal lakes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Ecology and biodiversity studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Periphyton; Watershed; Environmental science; Methylmercury; Logging; Hydrology (agriculture); Mercury (programming language); Surface runoff; Nutrient; Boreal; Biomass (ecology); Ecology; Geology; Bioaccumulation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004539733,0.00007680926,0.0001246974,0.0001246428,0.0003704969,0.00008013468,0.0001089798,0.00003416379,0.00004646714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006363043,0.0000581493,0.00001563853,0.0001638914,0.0006800197,0.0002687613,0.00002252195,0.0000552952,0.000001872211],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006088756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003179435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01139324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07946679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993337,0.00005210781,0.0001534871,0.0001396447,0.0001181802,0.0002028112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996849,0.00009606526,0.00004655587,0.00003337505,0.000004046894,0.0001350985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000170643,0.000005364763,0.9918115,0.000002152705,0.000002855022,0.00002211943,0.0009203067,0.000007811865,0.0008960211,0.000007274502,0.002870864,0.003436663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009543583,0.0002435248,0.9953995,0.00001622132,0.000006985247,0.00001275019,0.001367171,0.00006289873,0.0003929007,0.0002443833,0.002071197,0.00008701571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933819,0.0001764688,0.00000848855,0.005600385,0.0000746549,0.00005191876,0.000005828148,0.000001688419,0.0006986498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993904,0.00002330708,0.0002369388,0.0002665536,0.00001440524,7.034878e-7,9.346572e-7,0.000001448731,0.00006529091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06807355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02757114055148709,"score_gpt":0.2456799359361403,"score_spread":0.2181087953846532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}