{"id":"W2122842452","doi":"10.1139/s03-030","title":"The Forest Watershed and Riparian Disturbance study: a multi-discipline initiative to evaluate and manage watershed disturbance on the Boreal Plain of Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Watershed; Disturbance (geology); Riparian zone; Environmental science; Boreal; Taiga; Hydrology (agriculture); Logging; STREAMS; Riparian buffer; Ecology; Forestry; Geography; Geology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001245876,0.0001491515,0.0001692938,0.00003609294,0.000523766,0.00003785127,0.0002276156,0.00001499896,0.000005891861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110248,0.00007878513,0.00001684056,0.000117833,0.0006660721,0.000152555,0.0002397865,0.0001384336,6.000075e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001104065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009247672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006275336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002063879,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988203,0.00005678821,0.0002412898,0.0002218549,0.0003794063,0.0002803509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995028,0.0001243801,0.0001055116,0.0001424613,0.000003663514,0.0001212057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004217088,0.0005594778,0.8471425,0.0000479622,0.0003044375,0.0001617467,0.02476681,0.1087322,0.01345418,0.0008909981,0.00105562,0.002462328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005633614,0.0003428808,0.990904,0.00001771256,0.00002764644,0.00001411696,0.001764544,0.004594686,0.0006541967,0.00007028985,0.0009190045,0.000127508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980961,0.0001022462,0.0001715871,0.001096752,0.00008255096,0.0002368422,0.000004562561,0.000002321141,0.0002070303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994452,0.00007616364,0.0001969234,0.0001141878,0.000007724281,0.000008790601,1.968166e-7,0.000005760148,0.0001450799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1437615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4028438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00920431427987715,"score_gpt":0.2035909507133631,"score_spread":0.1943866364334859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}