{"id":"W2122911303","doi":"10.1177/0952076714529141","title":"A politics of priority setting: Ideas, interests and institutions in healthcare resource allocation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; University of British Columbia; University of Alberta; Vancouver Coastal Health","funders":"","keywords":"Allocative efficiency; Politics; Health care; Resource allocation; Resource (disambiguation); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Public administration; Economics; Political science; Law; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04912355,0.0005294222,0.0006511729,0.003608556,0.005091445,0.01843832,0.001798985,0.005694003,0.0027009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04419862,0.0005621087,0.0006973729,0.004407744,0.07648439,0.01702515,0.006918781,0.008477536,0.0002900829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01769993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008006375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003156656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002016896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9533302,0.03925117,0.0008760688,0.001373034,0.003526477,0.001643094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9347933,0.0554879,0.003769641,0.001650501,0.002455275,0.001843308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007451916,0.000006224011,0.0001271589,0.00001469553,0.000002295635,0.00001167422,0.0015914,0.0003056403,0.00001546032,0.9959759,0.0003470278,0.001595155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001281827,0.00000878566,0.0001939065,0.00008494958,0.000004098401,0.00001908985,0.001677303,0.0007535905,0.00005268521,0.9892998,0.007883674,0.000009443739],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08098251,0.02279392,0.1820697,0.4447717,0.001187357,0.0001262026,0.0001024517,0.00007168805,0.2678944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787624,0.002944528,0.01076639,0.004280192,0.0005919203,0.0001119823,0.00001428447,0.00003230868,0.002496016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04912355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2597932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2732075587694267,"score_gpt":0.4486163207376992,"score_spread":0.1754087619682726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}