{"id":"W2122964140","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00830.x","title":"A Closer Look at Cross‐Functional Collaboration and Product Innovativeness: Contingency Effects of Structural and Relational Context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Knowledge management; Context (archaeology); Business; Contingency theory; Product (mathematics); New product development; Autonomy; Structural equation modeling; Dyad; Marketing; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002208925,0.0002633679,0.0004496897,0.001247363,0.0009329408,0.002646717,0.0004369739,0.0005013276,0.004791048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009753465,0.0002230941,0.000656752,0.001016258,0.001794083,0.00315515,0.002594628,0.001073991,0.0001233588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008247292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009088832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001638773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002772605,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971837,0.001615211,0.0000734247,0.0002919709,0.0004914546,0.0003442011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784012,0.01605919,0.002585959,0.0008973557,0.0007880439,0.001268241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008988707,0.0006958363,0.8832873,0.000310565,0.0006286411,0.002546945,0.0142031,0.004264533,0.01050825,0.02820791,0.0002675471,0.05418059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004880782,0.0009783392,0.9646603,0.00008208565,0.0002306309,0.0008132916,0.01547356,0.003088851,0.001783642,0.01094538,0.001845393,0.00004976406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923128,0.0003197297,0.001243597,0.0002350185,0.000006938245,0.00001586519,0.00002082414,0.000007384498,0.005837743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996213,0.00005184887,0.0002117245,0.00001244674,0.000002758676,0.00000408773,0.000006717627,0.000001293614,0.00008779015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004791048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01602769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0276598091191533,"score_gpt":0.246905894064724,"score_spread":0.2192460849455707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}