{"id":"W2122964140","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00830.x","title":"A Closer Look at Cross‐Functional Collaboration and Product Innovativeness: Contingency Effects of Structural and Relational Context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Knowledge management; Context (archaeology); Business; Contingency theory; Product (mathematics); New product development; Autonomy; Structural equation modeling; Dyad; Marketing; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001313435,0.0002358942,0.0003185459,0.001069296,0.0002326962,0.0001257343,0.0001320869,0.00004550863,0.0001145781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003484409,0.000193721,0.00003602336,0.002374292,0.0001590632,0.001531278,0.0002664778,0.0001627909,0.000009352593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008966922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003274684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007823771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009670737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977205,0.00003066893,0.00120439,0.0003367205,0.0005198584,0.000187795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943613,0.00003311645,0.001823982,0.0001762248,0.0035942,0.00001120797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004521946,0.0001394366,0.1149735,0.001302223,0.0002783932,0.00001145291,0.0003284753,0.000007751737,0.004414315,0.8542556,0.001834475,0.02200221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003661764,0.0001316116,0.9275973,0.0002971345,0.0002192025,0.00002248046,0.0007978335,0.0002030427,0.007551276,0.02332882,0.03572113,0.0004683412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823229,0.0004687305,0.000694824,0.0008913396,0.001328987,0.0009251821,0.000002310864,0.00002976201,0.01333592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957563,0.00001973692,0.001780945,0.0006607419,0.0007242463,0.00002126328,0.00004081534,0.00001697317,0.0009790336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8309267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7899715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0276598091191533,"score_gpt":0.246905894064724,"score_spread":0.2192460849455707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}