{"id":"W2123017428","doi":"10.1109/icsea.2008.70","title":"Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning in Ergonomics for Software Engineers: A Case Study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Engineering management; Computer science; Software project management; Software; Human factors and ergonomics; Project-based learning; Software engineering; Knowledge management; Engineering; Software development; Software construction; Mathematics education; Psychology; Poison control","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003549206,0.0001385606,0.0001532349,0.0002563146,0.000129347,0.00005942416,0.0003612629,0.00004977658,0.00000209891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001647028,0.0001312014,0.00005423413,0.0003382769,0.000009147953,0.000440059,0.0002591142,0.0002060262,0.000002143046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006316233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001043981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001561351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005522497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991438,0.00003573594,0.0002067492,0.0003123578,0.00008138984,0.0002199256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990134,0.0005429826,0.00005135059,0.0003148039,0.0000390479,0.00003842767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000694298,0.006184436,0.168183,0.0006425488,0.0003007922,0.04656183,0.1256669,0.3742189,0.00008308607,0.002873415,0.03230909,0.2422817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001730761,0.002253145,0.001844216,0.00004668083,0.00001297598,0.002846752,0.002375416,0.9826946,0.0003338883,0.0001092174,0.0050498,0.0007026006],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2369759,0.00002198571,0.7612973,0.00005987047,0.00009687178,0.0005165889,5.925672e-7,0.00101238,0.00001845376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5949124,0.000001410381,0.404806,0.00002555654,0.00001926654,0.0001668256,0.000001108247,0.00001140304,0.00005614257],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6084756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5350237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04065203135153492,"score_gpt":0.3161537816317802,"score_spread":0.2755017502802453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}