{"id":"W2123214683","doi":"10.1177/0093854810389534","title":"A Comparison of Static and Dynamic Assessment of Sexual Offender Risk and Need in a Treatment Context","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Risk assessment; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Sex offender; Poison control; Sex offense; Injury prevention; Predictive validity; Human factors and ergonomics; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry; Demography; Sexual abuse; Medicine; Computer security; Medical emergency; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003806018,0.0002372624,0.0004186903,0.0012313,0.0005882921,0.0005909094,0.000426484,0.0003846562,0.001221274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01476853,0.0001719117,0.0004152993,0.0006042939,0.0007361998,0.0009474691,0.001112623,0.0005588561,0.00009375367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007652135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005763032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001424493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003347016,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967903,0.001888179,0.0002133805,0.000209241,0.0007570242,0.0001417195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916113,0.005282798,0.001706001,0.0002986082,0.0005924974,0.0005088656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006506782,0.002129765,0.8508215,0.0001693932,0.0003311293,0.0001811045,0.002515672,0.001175419,0.001480001,0.000802184,0.0003062885,0.1335807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001772042,0.01174291,0.9779683,0.00007631175,0.0001780274,0.0003946778,0.003297627,0.004263478,0.000656867,0.0006875306,0.0005132976,0.00004382733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986548,0.0001081982,0.0002667039,0.00005112463,0.000006820017,0.00004496629,0.00001828162,0.000003347108,0.0008457628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994173,0.00003789613,0.0003991014,0.00001293319,0.000004937883,0.00002666362,0.00002270577,6.476859e-7,0.00007788726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003806018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02012843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06194718718130207,"score_gpt":0.4257725758916998,"score_spread":0.3638253887103977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}