{"id":"W2123394245","doi":"10.1093/ecam/nem167","title":"Cost Effectiveness of Natural Health Products: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine","topic":"Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine","funders":"","keywords":"CINAHL; Medicine; EconLit; MEDLINE; Randomized controlled trial; Cochrane Library; Systematic review; Critical appraisal; Health care; Meta-analysis; Intensive care medicine; Clinical trial; Cost effectiveness; Alternative medicine; Psychological intervention; Surgery; Internal medicine; Psychiatry; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03834097,0.002300803,0.01866937,0.007903687,0.0007614641,0.004133403,0.002520443,0.003233746,0.005427574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1268235,0.00178696,0.01706343,0.009129639,0.002156728,0.003157023,0.001669497,0.002669198,0.0003347266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007301478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01021567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005438594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01263299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9495554,0.03012986,0.01205412,0.001929579,0.005773593,0.0005574675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8796909,0.0914814,0.02120067,0.001556325,0.005281284,0.0007892502],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005683814,0.00007208349,0.0007005105,0.8907093,0.06518289,0.00008123011,0.00008889491,0.0003309583,0.0001360132,0.0002977586,0.0008315809,0.03588503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01727287,0.003219642,0.00578083,0.5346221,0.4262284,0.0003950292,0.0003063158,0.0005622518,0.0004233024,0.001451654,0.0096296,0.0001079444],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002062538,0.9960359,0.0002761467,0.000309083,0.000186712,0.0007102377,0.0001832591,0.00000995925,0.0002261796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05247101,0.9416558,0.002065054,0.000857682,0.0002509411,0.002338742,0.000208045,0.0000159744,0.0001367967],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03834097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2027689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5819681175131713,"score_gpt":0.597101843879411,"score_spread":0.01513372636623966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}