{"id":"W2123440107","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2012.04.004","title":"The emotional side of cognitive distraction: Implications for road safety","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Distraction; Recall; Arousal; Valence (chemistry); Psychology; Emotional valence; Surprise; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Poison control; Driving simulator; Task (project management); Social psychology; Simulation; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007753085,0.0001068089,0.000187877,0.0001785888,0.00041863,0.00003526733,0.0001316095,0.0000724369,0.003681172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001880251,0.00008879777,0.0005582577,0.0004635214,0.00004777983,0.0003472059,0.00002158046,0.00009412819,0.0001662722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007214941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002026255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985828,0.00021645,0.0006446315,0.0001885134,0.0001598659,0.0002077301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981535,0.0006262364,0.0005467252,0.0002810065,0.0003273956,0.00006513194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004175854,0.001110906,0.684589,0.000003822089,0.006696364,1.150302e-7,0.002062158,0.0001169165,0.0002797038,0.1254457,0.005125237,0.1741526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038311,0.00002951518,0.9908862,0.00001226054,0.001201852,0.000004015806,0.001103401,0.0001211109,0.00006662885,0.001440298,0.004663074,0.0000886007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4487978,0.0005432695,0.5104302,0.003573782,0.001699564,0.001275603,0.0000350281,0.0001335823,0.0335112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911788,0.00003114371,0.0001110855,0.00004851825,0.0002338377,0.0002367177,0.0006489891,0.000009203836,0.007501721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.542381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04151389527655606,"score_gpt":0.4230572690451707,"score_spread":0.3815433737686146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}