{"id":"W2123486001","doi":"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2005.01.004","title":"A large deviation result for aggregate claims with dependent claim occurrences","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insurance Mathematics and Economics","topic":"Probability and Risk Models","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Aggregate (composite); Large deviations theory; Mathematics; Absolute deviation; Mathematical economics; Statistical physics; Econometrics; Statistics; Physics; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002028896,0.0001477303,0.0003248331,0.00008034681,0.000238715,0.0003005683,0.0003210802,0.00008295216,0.00001655758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002605647,0.00009900396,0.00006380605,0.00009366185,0.00008114993,0.0004942399,0.00005659704,0.00008319187,0.00004931218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003793073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005864455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003799996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006910987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984755,0.00002023007,0.0006673615,0.0003929998,0.0001842372,0.0002596631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983649,0.0006119506,0.0004000094,0.0003832245,0.0001536696,0.00008622315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005983394,0.001201736,0.04536237,0.0003372708,0.0001710588,0.00000263484,0.02151083,0.03610077,0.00008112936,0.5033151,0.001641831,0.3896769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001504197,0.0001363313,0.002253436,0.00006951953,0.00001713265,0.00002057375,0.0008464468,0.364041,0.0004938372,0.6145722,0.01569953,0.0003458112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9228559,0.000237709,0.07469258,0.0008858662,0.00009961509,0.0003792686,0.0002150644,0.00002175629,0.0006122299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9606585,0.0003138229,0.03852586,0.0001606941,0.00008275034,0.00004633605,0.000005210951,0.000009964995,0.0001968531],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3893311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4037264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0792549851744986,"score_gpt":0.3277287268951475,"score_spread":0.2484737417206489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}