{"id":"W2123642738","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/5/3/034011","title":"Accounting for carbon cycle feedbacks in a comparison of the global warming effects of greenhouse gases","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Research Letters","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Victoria","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Global warming; Radiative forcing; Carbon cycle; Climate change; Biosphere; Greenhouse gas removal; Atmospheric sciences; Nitrous oxide; Runaway climate change; Methane; Global temperature; Climatology; Effects of global warming; Ecology; Ecosystem","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005267744,0.0001760329,0.0002500513,0.00001636229,0.0001347381,0.00001109638,0.0005870929,0.00009592548,0.00008272332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001209462,0.0001462704,0.0001155736,0.0002598513,0.001383677,0.0001273098,0.0006868378,0.0004404993,0.00000962189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004948545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007508239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001303631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003588333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977414,0.0001187593,0.000366627,0.0003621082,0.0008506643,0.000560468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990189,0.0003130491,0.0001544699,0.00042344,0.000001327872,0.00008882713],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003504657,0.0002420015,0.6934555,0.00002996564,0.000007902482,0.000002141486,0.0002949772,0.009484645,0.2924797,0.00000753213,0.0000261037,0.003934521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008344247,0.0001270156,0.9287426,0.00004552557,0.00001549135,0.000003205318,0.0005064015,0.01595544,0.05314368,0.0001923876,0.0002465261,0.0001872885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983824,0.00004266265,0.0001967467,0.0002379542,0.0001374551,0.0007380763,0.00000838935,0.000007917697,0.0002483603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972161,0.00001102106,0.002535231,0.00008628173,0.00002758312,0.00005798438,0.000002497783,0.00002516536,0.00003810672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.239336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5964735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0104828950994625,"score_gpt":0.2784897499731145,"score_spread":0.268006854873652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}