{"id":"W2123690194","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00427.x","title":"Savings growth and the path of utility","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Path (computing); Constant (computer programming); Externality; Growth model; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Extension (predicate logic); Yield (engineering); Simple (philosophy); Welfare; Econometrics; Computer science; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000748657,0.0002364943,0.000164644,0.0005435057,0.0003587708,0.001547949,0.0003497697,0.0005276084,0.004816539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004359478,0.0001946986,0.0002784692,0.0005757345,0.001300701,0.002373638,0.0008447487,0.0009983197,0.0005762503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001858219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005929162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009758134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007719885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997701,0.00006813828,0.00001192525,0.00005540786,0.00005859854,0.00003581972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991938,0.0003377493,0.000136819,0.00008435603,0.0001788367,0.00006842222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005360928,0.00002243445,0.002831924,0.00005221034,0.00001469641,0.000139735,0.000310924,0.05550352,0.002145568,0.9010134,0.001204293,0.03670764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001535176,0.00005048832,0.004115769,0.00005439621,0.00001128605,0.0002871302,0.0001556936,0.07024689,0.002148137,0.9105971,0.0122938,0.00002396893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.578437,0.00198085,0.2898402,0.005403434,0.0001504228,0.00007950013,0.0008411164,0.0002958822,0.1229717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752579,0.0007127959,0.01245798,0.0000838833,0.00001389731,0.00002944177,0.0001127841,0.00003164991,0.01129955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004816539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01611292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03863006842712256,"score_gpt":0.1610984567246206,"score_spread":0.1224683882974981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}