{"id":"W2123927446","doi":"10.1177/1555343412440697","title":"Designing for Social Engagement in Online Social Networks Using Communities-of-Practice Theory and Cognitive Work Analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Usability; Online participation; Social computing; Process (computing); Social engagement; Domain (mathematical analysis); Online community; Computer science; Sociology; Public relations; World Wide Web; Social media; The Internet; Human–computer interaction; Political science; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006858061,0.0001240899,0.0003746974,0.0005962995,0.0004904348,0.00009849181,0.00009158804,0.00008541584,0.00001137011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002475565,0.0001248631,0.0001276122,0.0006896585,0.0000908748,0.0005065188,0.00009833692,0.0003347573,7.779242e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005222412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002601327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008829208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002030354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984763,0.0004401384,0.00044127,0.00008142835,0.0002728054,0.0002880435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894428,0.009727125,0.0003786678,0.00002488837,0.0003676616,0.00005881995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002664025,0.0004278105,0.08335389,0.0000874387,0.002502753,0.00002289462,0.2310669,0.009992859,0.00004126718,0.01015248,0.00002598005,0.6596617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005335138,0.000250805,0.2607717,0.005148828,0.007695652,0.00001270878,0.6491819,0.06651706,0.0000266978,0.003295715,0.0007440974,0.00101964],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4783612,0.001229383,0.5199775,0.000009835786,0.0001190022,0.00009695697,0.000002647179,0.000005217541,0.0001982336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852362,0.0001104234,0.01403688,0.00003887247,0.0005547804,0.000002551091,0.000002028669,0.000013404,0.0000049078],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6586421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5091768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08574631084439252,"score_gpt":0.3984166853676293,"score_spread":0.3126703745232368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}