{"id":"W2124019912","doi":"10.1111/ele.12508","title":"A global meta‐analysis of the relative extent of intraspecific trait variation in plant communities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Montréal; Algoma University; Queen's University","funders":"Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; European Research Council; Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute; Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Smithsonian Institution; Sight Research UK; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation; Natural Environment Research Council; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Intraspecific competition; Trait; Interspecific competition; Variation (astronomy); Plant community; Species richness; Ecosystem; Community","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003589294,0.00006005243,0.0002768587,0.00005234254,0.00004546712,0.000001300861,0.0001613615,0.0000473384,0.0002351799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003393597,0.00004343253,0.0001271785,0.0004081764,0.0004243085,0.00006155846,0.00009943639,0.00007637872,0.000004541915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001477836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000797857,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007897132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06472433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992102,0.0003075815,0.0002174297,0.00008042026,0.00008733705,0.00009699513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994558,0.0002301171,0.0001635278,0.0001287775,0.000008326343,0.00001341625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001667007,0.00008906735,0.908688,0.000001753088,0.008416922,0.000001367066,0.00802962,0.07031842,0.00008050905,0.004139324,0.0002115548,0.000006762968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001665039,0.00003034404,0.989439,5.591809e-7,0.004953897,8.677019e-7,0.0005971982,0.003159898,0.000004916945,0.001600859,0.000008241365,0.0000377428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947914,0.00002429193,0.000488302,0.003147836,0.00008548196,0.0001045329,0.00003554902,0.000003531778,0.00131902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990481,0.000004661375,0.0003432465,0.0005619408,0.000001810961,0.00001459112,0.000006391469,0.000001410757,0.0000178442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08075094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.952342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03200223263335859,"score_gpt":0.2412452251746158,"score_spread":0.2092429925412572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}