{"id":"W2124043037","doi":"10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00689.x","title":"A test of ecological succession hypotheses using 55‐year time‐series data for 361 boreal forest stands","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Lakehead University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Lakehead University","keywords":"Ecological succession; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Taiga; Abies balsamea; Boreal; Biology; Geography; Balsam; Botany","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002638928,0.0001295397,0.0002258801,0.0000387886,0.0002857927,0.000006682929,0.0002687798,0.0001834466,0.000235829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000154062,0.0001009568,0.00005387126,0.0002174024,0.001174228,0.0001979338,0.0004386592,0.00005235144,0.00001267669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001982042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001301476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001765743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005720003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990804,0.00004440648,0.0002135067,0.0003324809,0.0000630872,0.0002660806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994108,0.000186587,0.0001283516,0.0001966339,0.00002090336,0.00005672612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001375802,0.000229629,0.9976136,0.00001032634,0.00004388623,0.000003049185,0.00003238969,0.000005527213,0.0000806285,0.001047608,0.000536505,0.0002592353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003792757,0.0005729516,0.9847635,0.000004462184,0.00006468432,0.00001038246,0.0001022816,0.0006889979,0.00003678198,0.01294384,0.0003164138,0.0001164155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.992862,0.00008900974,0.0001438423,0.00007553333,0.00009611557,0.0002406209,0.0007405723,0.00002462786,0.005727709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927369,0.000138958,0.006900214,0.0001011141,0.00001302448,0.00001444834,0.00007555623,0.000003717027,0.00001609886],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01285012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4326493,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02643509001394252,"score_gpt":0.2525951187009697,"score_spread":0.2261600286870272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}