{"id":"W2124064483","doi":"10.2307/2656877","title":"Environmental distribution of four <i>Carex</i> species (Cyperaceae) in an old‐growth forest","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Botany","topic":"Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"University of Alberta; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Carex; Understory; Biology; Cyperaceae; Interspecific competition; Ecology; Botany; Old-growth forest; Species diversity; Range (aeronautics); Canopy; Poaceae","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009341679,0.0001830811,0.0001975627,0.0009329813,0.0007910121,0.0004333369,0.0002579752,0.0001987874,0.0006566563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001668791,0.0001155038,0.0001262171,0.0006427382,0.0004869282,0.0001699915,0.0002466638,0.0001566579,0.0001069361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001899305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004549567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2547405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6237485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999119,0.000009444821,0.000004660745,0.0000320632,0.0000133336,0.00002853142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997473,0.0000311853,0.00008380936,0.000008925711,0.00006845038,0.00006036481],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001596501,0.00003983859,0.9494719,0.00004231263,0.00004423351,0.0002572809,0.001457887,0.0001806373,0.04029426,0.00003722882,0.0001321015,0.007882752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.418508e-7,0.000009876279,0.999566,0.000001113965,0.000002385619,0.00002587794,0.0001495062,0.00003847456,0.0001070466,0.000001728545,0.00009565014,0.0000013264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996094,0.00003963371,0.0000152472,0.000003244744,2.762502e-7,0.000002432148,0.00006279895,0.0000015577,0.0002655237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995116,0.00003615588,0.0001049297,0.00001036691,7.382575e-7,0.000003768488,0.0001665956,0.000001035175,0.0001647972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2547405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5065154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01322618215172367,"score_gpt":0.1961112336328333,"score_spread":0.1828850514811097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}