{"id":"W2124072969","doi":"10.1111/risa.12158","title":"Risk Management of Domino Effects Considering Dynamic Consequence Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Domino effect; Risk analysis (engineering); Domino; Risk assessment; Bayesian network; Risk management; Process (computing); Bayesian probability; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Computer security; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003894217,0.0004058924,0.002037617,0.003966422,0.0004321279,0.0003227816,0.001297242,0.0001524084,0.002760148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001235005,0.0003062735,0.003202735,0.02135913,0.0004042773,0.0004462937,0.000321108,0.0003019286,0.001115582],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009934478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003638088,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007382034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002345061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927936,0.001328333,0.001908907,0.001250539,0.002148637,0.000569959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911766,0.003478058,0.00186737,0.002458383,0.0007082422,0.000311341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002768281,0.0001174171,0.6620411,0.00001988196,0.05318728,0.00007980107,0.0003682554,0.1694469,0.0001300309,0.0003686867,0.0002413131,0.1139716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004144034,0.0000305467,0.5450552,0.00001121595,0.06568231,0.000001763918,0.001279236,0.360149,0.0002930889,0.02655182,0.0001517453,0.0003796981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7852353,0.001157346,0.2109603,0.0001927262,0.00006262356,0.0002864249,0.00007576296,0.00005340264,0.001976135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754395,0.005843104,0.01724856,0.00003837527,0.00001211769,0.00004983884,0.00002379853,0.00001506631,0.001329607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1937117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01813798068961786,"score_gpt":0.3204601526683761,"score_spread":0.3023221719787582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}